Thought the Vision of Dame Kind is not specifically
Christian, there is nothing in it incompatible with the Christian
belief in a God who created the material universe and all its creatures
out of love and found them good: the glory in which the creatures
appear to the natural mystic must be a feeble approximation to their
glory as God sees them. There is nothing to prevent him from welcoming
it as a gift, however indirect, from God. To a Gnostic for whom matter
is the creation of an evil spirit, it must, of course, be a diabolic
visitation and to the monist who regards the phenomenal world as an
illusion, it must be doubly an illusion, harmless, maybe, but to be
seen through as soon as possible. To a philosophical materialist for
whom the notion of glory has no meaning, it must be an individual
delusion, probably neurotic in origin, and to be discouraged as
abnormal and likely to lead the patient into the more serious and
socially harmful delusion of some sort of theism. When such a staunch
atheist as Richard Jeffries can speak of praying "that I might touch
the unutterable existence even higher than deity," the danger of
allowing people to take solitary country walks becomes obvious.
W. H. Auden, Introduction to
The Protestant Mystics
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home